The Thing [QuickFix]
Dir: Matthjis van Heijningen Jr
USA/Canada, 2011
Sci-Fi/Horror, 103 min

A Norwegian research team has found something up in the ice
of Antarctic. Young palaeontologist Ramona Flowers… no wait, Kate Lloyd [
Mary
Elizabeth Winstead] is given the opportunity of her lifetime, to tag along and
perhaps discover something that will change mankind for the rest of time. After
revealing the spacecraft that supposedly crashed into the glacier several
hundred thousand years ago, they find a creature trapped in the ice. It becomes
Kate’s task to excavate the being, but shortly after the block of ice
captivating the monster is placed in the Norwegian camp, it breaks free and now
the people at the research centre are it’s prey… but you know that don’t you.
Because if you got this far, then I know that you are a fan of the original
just as much as I am.


Well, why is the question. Why does Hollywood insist on remaking
classics? There’ must be enough fresh idea’s out there. There must be enough
budding screenwriting talent out there that isn’t getting the shots they
deserve. There must be other areas one can dig into other that the movies that
once upon a time defined the horror genre. Now I’m not going to go on a rant
about remakes here, because I actually do like some of them. Although they
still look like crap compared to the originals, and perhaps it’s even worse
when the new version puts the original to shame. Never the less, this is
The
Thing remake, or prequel as it turns out… oh, now that can’t really have been
missed by anyone who really wanted to see this movie… If you go into seeing
this film without knowledge of the original then I guess I’m older than you and
you still have some great shit to discover along the way.

I read somewhere that someone thought that the link to the
old film at the end was brilliant… well it is, but at the same time, there’s at
least ten different links to the original movie woven into the texture of the
movie throughout the entire film. SO perhaps you should have seen the original
before listening to people talking about this one outside the theatre!

Although I did enjoy the nihilism that came with this flick,
I loved going into it knowing that not a single person will come out alive.
There’s almost a perverted buzz going on as I sat back and waited to see how
they off this bunch this time around… and in all honesty I think they failed. Yeah, I love the darkness, but the monsters
are revealed way to early, and they’re way to visual. Half the magic of the original
is the paranoia. Something I never really feel creeping over me the same way
that it did in the Carpenter version. Heck, if you break it down, this one is
more or less a scene for scene remake of Carpenters version, sluggishly
following the beats and twists of that gem, so how come they missed that vital
beat I’ll never know. But then again, it get’s the job done and with knowledge
of the original, I feel that it’s still quite fun to watch. Although I have a
major problem with the ending! Not the link to the original, but the way they
just leave Kate out there in the cold with nothing but the threat of a possible
sequel looming… Yeah, I could just see them scripting some fucked up sequel
where Kate manages to make it to the US camp, hook up with MacReady [Kurt
Russell] and Childs [Keith David] and go yet another round with the beast. It’s
the only loose end (or one of the few) between the two movies and in all
honestly I feel that it’s just a screenwriter thing, it’s just their love for
their character that led them to leaving us with the sloppy ending. Because
it’s been done before in the original, but there was a threat, a possibility
that Macready or Childs may have been the alien… here’ there’s nothing. I would
still have been better to have gone to crack of dawn, Kate’s dead frozen body
in the snow buggy, then have the familiar Norwegian helicopter swoosh by on
it’s way to Lars and the camp to tie the sack together.

A big bonus for The Thing 2011, is that pretty boy Eric
Christian Olsen is of no use at all through out the movie and dies a terrible,
but deserving death. I was scared to hell that he’d be the “heroic”
counterpart to Mary Elizabeth Winsted, but instead we get Joel Egerton who
get’s the job done.


The Thing get’s 4/6 for effort, because like the alien, this
movie has mimicked the close to perfection. I’m pretty certain that you could
take a couple of splices from
The Thing 2011 and insert them into
The Thing 1982
and they’d play seamless. So hat’s off to set decorator
Odetta Stoddard, art director
Patrick Banister, and production
designer
Sean Haworth. I can appreciate the love and respect for the original being
woven into this prequel, and I really dig the details, like the Norwegians
speaking Norwegian, the fine threads that connect this to the original – again,
it in a lot smarter way than the ending which coincidentally lifts two shots
out of the original to make them flow together even better.

But I hate when remakes posing as prequels have much more
advanced monsters! Where the monster in the original – and let’s not fuck
around here, the monster in Carpenter’s original is the star, Russell plays
second fiddle to that imaginative beast that Rob Bottin created – was a
imaginative weird thing that I’d never seen before. It freaked me the fuck out,
and the monster here, although impressive as it is combining old school prosthetics,
green screen and CGI, the error in my opinion is that they never really keep it
the fuck off screen… instead it’s more of a showcase for showing off cool
effects, yeah they are cool, but the more you show of the monster, the more it
feels as if I’m playing a videogame! That’s exactly where The Thing fails in my
book, keep the monster in the dark and build towards a really freaky reveal
that I will take with me after the film is over… something that jiggles my
imagination with the necessary what the hell was that questions, not a Oh, so
that’s what it looks like… Nightmares
are made of the things lurking in the dark, not the pathetically lame computer
generated monsters… Now I know I’ve been harassing CGI a lot lately, but do it
right and it looks awesome, and that I’m fine with, but if I can see that it
looks crap, why don’t the studios?

No comments:
Post a Comment