GUT
Directed by: Elias
USA, 2012
Horror/Thriller, 90min
Two childhood friends, who grew up watching horror and even made
their own home made low budget horror films, Tom [Jason Vail], Dan [Nicholas
Wilder – who gives an outstanding performance] both work in the same office as
adults. They are still friends, but the space between them makes itself
painfully apparent at times. Tom never comes over for video nights as much as
he used to as he spends most of his out of office time with wife and their
daughter. One day Dan manages to lure Tom over for intriguing night of old
fashioned horror gawking. The oddity Dan shows Tom is a film he’s obtained over
the Internet from an obscure source… With no narrative at all, the film
consists of a single shot of a stomach being sliced and a hand stuffed into the
cavity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b00ad/b00ad1a937c1e71c1c155ad8211e44572d5b3dae" alt=""
GUT is an intriguing treat. An intelligent and sardonic slow
grinder that digs it’s way into the head of its audience. It’s a movie that
plays with our basic emotions of not wanting to be alone. It’s also a movie
that digs into the emotions anyone who has passed the age of thirty has through
at some point in time. Questioning if it’s time to change, raising the subject
if this is all there is to life.
Indie films, especially indie horror, are quite often let down through crap characters
and shallow portrayals due to the fact that some indie filmmakers chose to aim straight for the shock and awe
moments. GUT is quite the opposite, and is all about character, depth and showcases
its moments of grotesqueness with a delicate hand. There may not be any Boo
moments – which would really be out of place here as this is psychological
horror – but it presents some pretty striking scenes of cold steel slicing
through soft tender flesh. But that’s not the prime focus of GUT; it’s the
Characters that are the center of attention here.
I’m not going to get into the “Snuff tape” discussion,
as I really don’t see that element being the main key to the movie. The movie
is about the two men, the tape merely a device to set the action in motion. Lead
character, Tom could abandon Dan on several occasions after the initial viewing.
But his backstory and history with Dan keep him returning to his once friend,
even going back to watch a second, and third recording. Without the delicate
portrayal of the two leading men, the film would never have had any of the
power it holds over it’s audience.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d77ba/d77bab44948e6547294d0d07a177a01c2ab8f8d6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcb72/bcb72222b97e4e6be8c35f46481eda1622a6174b" alt=""
If I break it down and stick it under the analytic gaze, GUT
is a movie about two men and the space that has occurred in-between them. They
used to be close, but time and growing up has drawn them apart. With that in
hand the events of the film make sense. One could argue that the film is all
about how far you would go to keep a relationship. What would you do to cling
on to that one best friend you constantly feel slipping away from you?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/866b1/866b109425d27779dca2587f6ef36f077af3b283" alt=""
So the inciting incident is found when Tom, somewhat degradingly, asks Dan “Seen any
gore porn lately?” and Dan sardonically replies “Oh Better…You have to see this
to believe it…” Dan has started his quest to regain his friendship with Tom,
and Tom is sent off on his journey as he watches the film Dan has obtained. Both men entangled in the web of the sinister
recording.
It would be easy to say that the opening shot of GUT is the
initial attack, but I’m saying it’s not. It’s a red herring and certainly an
attention grabber. Part of Elias cunning play with convention… Instead the
initial attack comes much later, almost ten minutes into the film. Elias opts
to establish his characters first. Tom’s
boring life, Dan’s lonely life, and then presents what I say is the initial
attack, where the camera almost candidly lingers just below the table which the
yet unseen assailant slices up a young woman on. There’s a video camera rigged
to the right of frame – obviously taping the scene Dan will receive and show
Tom later. Now we know that there’s someone slicing up young women, and it
gives us three optional paths of through, Dan, Tom or someone yet to be
presented.
The guilt Tom experiences and the projective nightmares
drive him to force Dan into a corner. It’s the same guilt that keeps Tom from
abandoning Dan there and then. You can’t abandon your oldest friend without
feeling guilty. But when cornered Dan breaks down. Reveals truths that
completely shatter the rekindled friendship. It also sets the scene for the
possible threat of an external part. In easy and intelligent ways, Elias weaves
a delicate story with many layers and paths that keep it from being
predictable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e2b3/6e2b3a8664c5dc7518640ab793f104513c338fdc" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efbde/efbdec128d0ab93248dbfddf08f0fcaff3d71f1e" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment