Directed by: Paco Plaza
Spain, 2012
Horror, 8o min
Why the hell are people giving this film a hard time? Do
they not see how this part fits into the series? Are they anally stuck in the
groove of the first two? What is it they don’t get with this part? Are they
annoyed that the film has an immensely strong and determined female protagonist?
The first one did so why not this one? It plays by all the same rules, starts
off with the found footage /raw material lark and moves on from it… for real,
would you really want a third entry all shot through the viewfinder again? If
that’s your bag, then you may want to stick to the Paranormal Activity or
Resident Evil flicks and see how long you can take it. Despite it being against
our human nature, change is a good thing, and this kind of ignorance is what
generates trouble for innovative and original movies. [REC] 3: Genesis is
totally being trashed for all the wrong reasons and I’m going to tell you why
it’s a better film than it's being made out to be.
It’s the wedding day of young couple Clara [Leticia Dolera]
and Koldo [Diego Martín]. Cue handycam photography, and Clara’s almost on
camera confession that’s interrupted by distortion just as she says hat she’s
going to share a secret with the young cinematographer. Family and friends meet
and greet each other at the church before the procession. Here comes the bride.
The procession moves over to the reception in a huge party hall in a city park.
It’s all cake, drinks, dancing and a happy day until one guest falls off the
balcony down onto a table two floors down. As the guests rush forth to check on
Uncle Pepe [Emilio Mencheta], he springs up and takes a huge bite out of his
wife’s neck. The virus hits hard and within moments the party is divided into
two groups, hunters and prey. In the panic and confusion that follows Clara and
Koldo are separated although swear to be reunited and defeat the undead beasts
that are chasing, savaging and eating the guests all locked in the party hall.
There, that’s the story, and compared to the previous two,
it’s the same thing. Survival horror in a secluded location! Nothings changed,
apart from the stage not being the central flats of the two earlier films. One
huge change is that when the shit hit’s the fan, the eye-view gaze is dropped
for a normal feature cinematography. Something I find effective and necessary
to bring a new focus to the story and not the gimmickry, which was great in the
original and started to loose its charm already in the second part.
Personally I thought that the second film was somewhat a let down, especially
the religious hokey pokey aspect of the film. I get it, but it’s kind of out of
place for me. So seeing that angle being used as in this third part kind of
makes up for the religious play in the second as it’s obviously going to be
part of a larger arc to run through the series. I’d love to see the final part
explain the religious aspect further, because if this is a blood disease, then
why does religion affect it? Questions I hope the final part will answer to
some extent, but not completely expose as we really don’t need answers to everything. Some of the
mysticism needs to be kept intact.
Paco Plaza is a trickster with suspense and uses our own
anticipation to wind us up. It’s classic Hitchockian gameplay. Place the bomb
under the desk, show the audience, then sit back and watch them get stressed
out as the leading man walks into the same room, completely unaware of the
ticking danger that will explode at any moment. That’s exactly what Plaza does
with the establishing setup of [REC]3: Genesis. He introduces us to a new set
of characters, a new ordinary world if you like, and plants the bomb as Uncle Pepe
shows off the wound he got from a dog he presumed was dead but sprung back to
life and bit him in the hand down at his veterinarian clinic, the first of many
tie ins with the world of the first two films, and then smoothly build up our
anticipation of the first attack.
Another fine detail that ties in with the first two is that
the reflections of the infected look like Medeiros from the earlier films.
Small details like this are interwoven throughout the film – then again, the
way some people seem to connect original films with their new sequels/prequels
with out a solid hard “And this is where the other one started” plaque these
details are probably lost on a lot of popcorn chomping conventionalists. But at
the core of the film is a value more important than any of the other two. Those
films where just about survival, plain and simple survival horror, albeit done
with fines and the first viewer gimmick.. This one is all about protecting
life! Their love for each other is a valuable one, and the secret that Carla
holds is a most valuable one. It’s not about surviving the moment and it’s not
about getting out of the location. It’s about saving their future together.
This is why the narrative is so engaging; the value at stake is a noble one and
one that is significant to mankind.
At the hour mark, the passageway into the last act, the two
newly weds have a chance to be reunited, and Plaza makes the most of it
creating a fantastically intense scene where all that has been fought for is at
stake. Again small details that have been planted earlier on come into play and
are cleverly used in the story. Compared to a lot of the current
infection/zombie horror that I’ve seen lately, I really found [REC] 3: Genesis
to kick some ass.
Plaza gets some funny tension relieving jokes in there too. The
way the various camera sources capture small fragments of the plot, the way the
photographers interact with each other and the moment that shifts the film from
viewfinder horror to full-blown fright fest. I love the Sponge John gag, and
the copyrights guy who’s the but end of several lines. There’s also a great
feminist angle if you choose to search for it, as Carla is the dominating
protagonist of the piece. Male roles are frequently used as vulnerable, weaker
characters. Where they suit up in armor and hide, Carla tears up her dress for
more space to move with and arms up with a chainsaw and let’s that power tool
rip! If nothing else, the gore and effects from here on should have satisfied the
majority of the mopey crowd. So even if [REC]3: Genesis brings a vague dark comedic
element to the arena, it’s still not a comedy, not even close. This is horror
playing pretty close to a convention, so what’s the problem. Next the Internet
will be filling up with reviews hating that the new Evil Dead isn’t funny enough!
Change is good.
It’s almost like a pack behavior, where it only takes one
negative to influence the rest of the mob as they don’t have enough balls to
stick to their own opinions. Nobody can point out what and why it is supposedly
a bad film, they all chant to the same “Letdown, disappointment, not a REC
movie”, but without making point of why and what… again, change is good, do not
resist it. Keep up, do your homework!
I would have liked to see [REC 3] with its “Genesis” subtitle
to have been perhaps more of a genesis story, but if you know your bible, you
will understand the reason for this subtitle, as Genesis is the chapter that
Priest reads from the bible, genesis – the creation of the earth… I can’t wait
to see where Jaime Balaguero takes the last part and then watch the series back
to fucking back with a bang!
[REC]3: Genesis is a straight up honest horror entertainment
and the full arc may disclose how it fits together (if you didn’t catch the
many links to the others already) with the final installment later this year.
I’d easily bet that there will be some connection with this part in the final
one too. To think that Plaza and Balaguero with their co-writers haven’t been
talking throughout is insanity, and after all when both films where presented
in Cannes back in 2010, the tagline was TWO radically different NEW films… One
last time, all together now, Change is good!
[REC]3: Genesis is an emotional film, and a devastating
film, a love story in hell and a fucking great sequel. Where so many
“infection/zombie” films have tried to portray heartbreak and sorrow of the
lovers facing one half of them slowly drifting into death – only to become an
undead – [REC]3: Genesis nails it so beautifully and delicately that it will bring
tears to your eyes.
1 comment:
I watch the movie on your recommendation and thought it was a thoroughly satisfying film! It was scary, funny, and reasonably intelligent. It much better than some of the new films like Mama.
Post a Comment